David Geffen Hall at Lincoln Center, Orchestra (Seat
NN20, $46).
Program
MASS: A Theater Piece for Singers, Players and Dancers (1971)
by Bernstein (1918-1990).
Artists
Nmon Ford, celebrant
Concert Chorale of New York – James Bagwell, choral
director
Young People’s Chorus of New York City – Elizabeth Nunez,
associate artistic director
Tenzin Gund-Morrow, boy soprano
Street Chorus: see photo for members
Dancers: see photo for members
First, some background material I want to record so I can
reference it in the future. This work
was commissioned by Jacqueline Kennedy for the opening of the JFK Center for
the Performing Arts in Washington DC in September 1971. Given the controversy of Leonard Bernstein’s
political views, Nixon – the US president at that time – was advised not to
attend; the reason given was “this should be Mrs. Kennedy’s night.” Not being a Catholic, I cannot tell how
closely the structure of the program hews to the traditional order of mass; it appears
close enough. Except Bernstein
interposes a lot of material that questions the celebrant’s faith, with the
celebrant finally giving in and shattering the sacraments. The arguing with God aspects seem to be a
Jewish tradition. Also unconventional
was that the Mass was written by an atheist of Jewish descent; Bernstein did
claim to be a spiritual person and wanted to write some sort of sacred music
(per the Program Notes.) In addition to
traditional Latin liturgical texts, Bernstein put in some Hebrew prayers and
lyrics (in English) written by himself and Stephen Schwartz (of Godspell fame.)
The music is an amalgam of various genres, including pop,
jazz, classical, and 12-tone. But the
most predominant genre is broadway and street-singing. Some recorded music was used; I also wonder
how they sync up these tapes, and the transitions tonight were smooth. The street chorus mainly played the role of doubters
who constantly challenged the celebrant’s belief with “tropes” such as “I don’t
know” and “Easy” that questioned the nature of sin and the worth of confession,
respectively. This theme and counter-theme basically guided the rest of the music,
resulting in the shattering of the sacraments.
With the aid of binoculars, one could easily observe tiny
microphones worn by the singers. The technician
working the equalizer for them had a hard time keeping up with switches,
resulting in some weak beginnings and an occasional loud feedback noise. Our seats were in the second to last row of
the main hall, and the voices came across fine, most of the time. The celebrant did a lot of singing, and
was on stage nearly all of the time. He
sounded uncertain at times, but generally did well. It took me a while to locate the mic on him.
The staging was simple, with the altar as the centerpiece
behind which stood the Young People’s Chorus.
Members of the concert chorale were seated in the front boxes of the
first tier, women and men on opposite sides.
Dancers and street chorus used the stage to do their “thing,” and the
orchestra occupied the first few rows of the auditorium.
The Program was advertised to be two hour long, without
break. It did take two hours, but didn’t
feel that long; there were too many things happening that kept me occupied.
Before we decided to go to this event, we debated whether
we really wanted to see it as we weren’t sure if it was worth the time (and
money) to see something that might offend us.
We decided we were not that sensitive, and we had probably encountered
the sentiments expressed in the work anyway.
We had some idea of what they would be anyway: Cornell made the cover of Time
because of the occupation of the student center by activists, and the Engineering
library was occupied for several days by anti-war protesters when I was an
undergraduate. Compared to other
controversial works (Stravinsky’s, for example), this was tame. The only cuss word used that I could catch
was “goddam” and there was only one crude scene where sexual intercourse was
simulated by two fully clothed actors.
When the celebrant threw the sacraments on the ground, I
thought the program ended and was about to take a few photos. Good thing I was slow, as the flute began to
play a rather interesting tune (I would say also the most original) followed by
singing by the boy soprano. The Program
Notes describes this as a new hope and resurrection: everything is well. The cynical may say this simply describes the
next generation of “suckers” being born.
Curtain Call. The celebrant (Ford) and boy soprano (Gund-Morrow) are at the center. Some members of the Concert Chorale can be seen sitting in the first tier; the Young People's Chorus at the back of the stage.
Overall, this was not a satisfactory experience, even
though we had no idea what to expect. Bernstein
the composer was often maligned by his critics as being lightweight, this work
would add to their ammunition. Other
than the occasional passages of brilliance, most of it sounded recycled. The skepticism of some that the work would
not have a lasting value (as noted in the Program Notes) has borne out, even to
one where the anti-war, modernist movements were at the peak during his first
years in the United States. The one thing
to admire was how tonight’s performance went without a hitch given the
different elements involved.
A search of the web returned many positive reviews
(judging by the headlines) of the performance.
The New York Times review is titled “’Mass’ Brings Out the Worst in Leonard
Bernstein.” Perhaps the cruelest remark
by the reviewer was “hard to discern … why we should perform it at all – other than
as a relic.”
[Note added 7/21/2018. A couple of remarks. First was how Mostly Mozart has been transforming into A Little Mozart over the years. The reasoning - if one can call it that - is this is "in keeping with Mozart's spirit of innovation and creativity." The question is, which composers are thereby excluded? The other was the similarity of my reaction to one Seinfeld had with Whatley as a Jewish comedian: that it offended him not as a Jewish person, but as a comedian. For tonight the disappointment is not as not as much about the message as it is about the music.]
[Note added 7/21/2018. A couple of remarks. First was how Mostly Mozart has been transforming into A Little Mozart over the years. The reasoning - if one can call it that - is this is "in keeping with Mozart's spirit of innovation and creativity." The question is, which composers are thereby excluded? The other was the similarity of my reaction to one Seinfeld had with Whatley as a Jewish comedian: that it offended him not as a Jewish person, but as a comedian. For tonight the disappointment is not as not as much about the message as it is about the music.]
We left at around 11:30 am to have lunch with our friend
Ron W in Malvern PA, and it was close to 11 pm when we got home. A relative long day for us. Dinner was street food in NYC.
No comments:
Post a Comment