David Geffen
Hall at Lincoln Center. Orchestra (Seat
X110, $82.50).
Program
Piano Concerto
No. 5 in E-flat major, Op. 73, Emperor (18 by Beethoven (1770-1827).
Symphony No. 3
in F major, Op. 90 (1882-83) by Brahms (1833-97).
Sometimes you
feel here is this herd effect in the music world where many artists seem to
concentrate on the same few solo pieces.
The piece that seems to be in vogue recently seems to be Beethoven’s
Emperor Concerto. A rough scan of this
blog returns the event once or twice a year.
That is not necessarily a complaint: I mentioned before that I heard
Beethoven’s violin concerto nearly every day one summer and didn’t tire of it.
The last time I
heard this was in Sydney, performed by Garrick Ohlsson, conducted by
Ashkenazy. Ohlsson is a big man, Hough
is quite small in comparison. Yet the
thing that came across most prominently was both of them dispatched the piece
with a serious demeanor, not at all given to flamboyance. This evening Hough delivered a technically flawless
performance, and mostly let the music speak for itself through the way it was
structured. He did vary the tempo at
selected places, to mixed effect.
Stephen Hough at curtain call, with Alan Gilbert looking on from the podium.
I noticed that
the Concertmaster and the Principal bass were not present for the concerto,
perhaps they are observing the usual “tradition” of excusing themselves when a
soloist is present?
Despite my
having heard it several times before (mostly recently in January, 2015, by the Budapest
Festival Orchestra conducted by Ivan Fischer), Brahms’s third symphony
continued to sound unfamiliar to me. To
prepare for the evening, I watched the first movement on YouTube while going
through an abridged score. This helped
me to recognize the F-A flat-F motto, denoting the words “free but happy.” The other finding was a section of the
movement is repeated. \ The recording was made by the Chicago Symphony Orchestra
conducted by Georg Solti. One obvious
difference was the level of precision in the YouTube video was just so much
better than what I heard tonight. Even with
a simplified score, one could see the challenge the music would present to an
orchestra, with its runs and syncopated passages. Again the third movement
sounded very familiar.
Gilbert conducted
with great energy, and with good effect – despite my misgivings. It occurred to me this would be a more
satisfying opening concert for the year than the one we heard last week. Gilbert also took the occasion to pay tribute
to Carl Schiebler, the recently deceased personnel manager or the orchestra.
The line in the
New York Times review, “Masterworks you hear all the time,” is an apt
description of the program. The reviewer
had only one paragraph devoted to the performance, including this one liner for
the symphony: “Mr. Gilbert drew from them a spirited, richly textured account
of Brahms’s Third Symphony.” In
contrast, the review in New York Classical Review contains a detailed critique
of the evening, and tries to attribute Gilbert’s “micro-conducting” to the
visiting musicians in the orchestra. He
thought the horn was too loud, and I thought it sounded uncharacteristically
unsteady the entire evening, and was surprised that it was the principal that
played.
We drove up and
parked on Amsterdam Ave, dinner was at East Szechuan. The drive back was also straightforward.
1 comment:
For your consideration.
Post a Comment