Prudential Hall
at NJPAC, Newark, NJ. Tier 1 (Seat B11,
$52).
Program – all Tchaikovsky (1840-1893).
Polonaise from
Eugene Onegin, Op. 24 (1878).
Piano Concerto
No. 1 in B-flat Minor Op. 23 (1875).
Symphony No. 5
in E Minor, Op. 64 (1888).
This was Zhang’s
debut as the music director of the organization, and the all-Tchaikovsky
program, while safe and traditional, was heavy weight. It could be impressive if the pieces were performed
brilliantly, but there were also quite a few musical and technical traps that
could trip up the artists.
The program
started with a rather familiar tune from Eugene Onegin. Although I had seen the opera and the ballet
(using music from the opera), I didn’t recall where the tune came from. The Program Notes says it takes place during
an elegant ball in the home of a wealthy Russian noble. In any event, the short piece got the concert
off to a great start. The elegance
certainly came through, this is a fine orchestra.
Music lovers are
familiar with Tchaikovsky’s piano concerto.
The program notes reminded me that it was rejected by several Russian
pianists as unplayable, and was thus premiered in the US (Boston.) The three movements are Allegro non troppo e
molto maestoso, Andantino semplice, and Allegro con fuoco. Our seats in Tier 1 gave us an excellent view
of the virtuosity required of the pianist, and the Macedonian pianist Trpceski
came through brilliantly. Nothing fazed
him, not double octaves in both hands, not the fast passages, and he made the
piano sing. Mixed in my admiration of
his technical skills was admiration of his musicality.
Simon Trpceski and Xian Zhang at conclusion of Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1.
Looking back
over my blog, I had seen it only once live over the last ten-plus years,
performed by Bronfman with the New York Philharmonic, in October, 2013. While I don’t remember what the performance
was like, I have no reason to think today’s performance was in any way not as
good as that one.
Tchaikovsky’s
Fifth is often called “fate” for the theme that started the 50-minute long
symphony, and used numerous times in all the movements. This is a difficult piece, and the orchestra
was up to the task. It was an overall
exhilarating experience. And one where I
clearly heard a last ray of hope (“fate” played in “almost” major mode) which
was quickly dashed. As an encore, the
coda of the last movement was repeated.
The rendition
was not without its obvious flaws, though.
The melody that starts the slow movement is always a challenge for the
principal horn. It is a very familiar
tune, and every listener expects perfection, which must put a lot of pressure
on the artist. He got all the notes
right, the phrasing smooth, but I thought the overall effect was a bit off, and
wished that he had given it a stronger punch.
Anne’s view was during some passages the sections were playing
independently and didn’t blend together.
And we both agreed that we had heard better with the New York
Philharmonic.
I was hoping to
be able to say Zhang would make one forget about Lacombe, but I can’t for
now. It may be too much to ask for from
a debut performance anyway. We have
tickets to several additional NJSO concerts, and I am hopeful.
Zhang was full
of energy as always. Today she even wore
flat-bottom shoes. Nonetheless, it was
only when she stepped off the podium that one realized how small she is. The orchestra seemed to respond to her well.
The New York Times review was posted a few hours ago.
After characterizing the audience as consisting of retired, old, and
afraid of the dark, he described the program as “safe” and wondered where Zhang
would take the orchestra. To that last
point I would say for the next several years leave the adventure to the New York Philharmonic, instead
work on realizing the potential of the orchestra to be a top-notch one. He did have good things to say about how the
pieces were performed.
Today’s concert
began at 1:30 pm, our drive to and back from NJPAC was straightforward. I was a bit disappointed that there were
quite a few empty seats in the auditorium, perhaps the rainy day had something
to do with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment