David Geffen
Hall at Lincoln Center. Orchestra (Seat W107, $69.50).
Program – Rachmaninoff
(1873-1943): A Philharmonic Festival. Week 1.
The Isle of the
Dead, Symphonic Poem after Arnold Bocklin, Op.. 29 (1909).
Rhapsody on a
Theme of Paganini, Op. 43 (1934).
Piano Concerto
No. 2 in C minor, Op. 18 (1900-01).
We got tickets
to this and next week’s concerts, thinking Trifonov playing Rachmaninoff, so it
must be great. Indeed it is.
The Isle of Dead is inspired by Bocklin's painting of the same title. James Keller, the annotator,
stresses how the tone poem unrolls in three connected sections, with opening Lento
in 5/4 meter, followed by Tranquillo in 3/4 time. The last section Largo starts
in 4/4 time and eventually yielding to the earlier meters, particularly the
5/4. The sections in turn depict the sea, the island, and death itself. With the help of a reproduction of Bocklin’s
painting, a listener can easily imagine a somber trip to a mausoleum on an
island.
I thought I
appreciated this more than the last time I heard it. Going over my notes, I didn’t catch the “Dies
Irae” then, today I had no problem catching the many fragments in the
composition. I didn’t hear a complete
phrase, though. Also, I wonder if a more
detailed description of the tone poem exists (like in Strauss’s Alpine
Symphony we got in Cleveland recently.) It would add a lot to
understanding of how the music relates to the painting.
No doubt many
superlatives have been used to describe Trifonov’s playing, deservedly so. There are many things to marvel about his
technique and musicality. With the
Rhapsody, what stood out was how fresh he made it sound. Not an easy task for a composition that is
basically a set of variations, and one of great familiarity. The changes in tempo, in intensity, in lightness
of touch, all helped to make this war horse gallop triumphantly from the
piano. The freshness was also helped by
the clear transitions from one section to the other, which I don’t recall from
the two recent performances of this piece I heard.
That Trifonov is
a great musician also came through in the concerto. It is quite easy to dazzle by simply pounding
out the notes, the virtuosity required will leave the audience in awe. But tonight we had a real dialog between the
soloist and the orchestra, with the piano often providing the obbligato
part. There was no doubt who the star
was, though. The three movements are
Moderato, Adagio sostenuto, and Allegro scherzando. The simple second movement was achingly
beautiful, with the flute providing the melody.
If one wonders
why there is no cadenza, the answer probably is – with a few exceptions - the
entirely piece is a cadenza.
Trifonov played an encore cadenza that is a medley based on various well-known tunes. I recall his doing a program of his own music in Pittsburgh (I believe,) so I wonder if this was his own work. In any case, he certainly seemed to enjoy himself a lot. A great pianist writing music for himself, I wonder whom that reminds me of. He was still very "Linus" in his posture, although he did straighten himself up every now and then.
We saw Macelaru
at the Mostly Mozart Festival this past summer.
He certainly led the Isle of the Dead with great enthusiasm and
intensity, and the orchestra responded well.
For the Rachmaninoff pieces he had a great partnership with
Trifonov. I enjoyed today’s
concert more than I did the M|M one. Not
sure if it is the orchestra, the program, or the soloist.
We noticed most
of the principals were away: at least the concertmaster, the principal cello
and viola, and the principal flute; our seats didn’t have a great view of
everyone on stage. I know Frank Huang is in Houston (doing Sarasate’s
Zigeunerweisen,) what are other folks’ excuse?
Sheryl Maples had to do quite a few solo lines, and did very well. I noticed that she moved around quite a bit more
also.
I do wonder if
three weeks of Rachmaninoff is too much: I don’t know if I can take so much exhilaration.
We were a bit rushed this afternoon, so only had a light meal before we drove up to the city. We did buy some food from a street stand, and ate that in our car, before we headed home. All that, we still got back by 11 pm.
[Note added 11/15. Here is the New York Times review. For reasons unfathomable to me, he thinks there is no need for a Rachmaninoff Festival, but he did have a lot of good things to say about the concert. The encore (which I mistakenly typed as "cadenza," since corrected) was indeed Trifonov's work, a "shamelessly flashy arrangement of Strauss's Overture to 'Die Fledermaus.'"]
We were a bit rushed this afternoon, so only had a light meal before we drove up to the city. We did buy some food from a street stand, and ate that in our car, before we headed home. All that, we still got back by 11 pm.
[Note added 11/15. Here is the New York Times review. For reasons unfathomable to me, he thinks there is no need for a Rachmaninoff Festival, but he did have a lot of good things to say about the concert. The encore (which I mistakenly typed as "cadenza," since corrected) was indeed Trifonov's work, a "shamelessly flashy arrangement of Strauss's Overture to 'Die Fledermaus.'"]
1 comment:
What was the encore?
Post a Comment