Prudential Hall
at NJPAC, Newark, NJ. Orchestra (Seat
N111, $52.)
Program
Symphony No. 6
in D Minor, “La Casa del diavolo,” Op. 12, No. 4 (G, 506) (ca. 1771) by
Boccherini (1742-1805).
Ancient Airs and
Dances, Suite No. 1 (1917) by Respighi (1879-1936).
The Four Seasons
for Violin and Orchestra, Op. 8 (1720s) by Vivaldi (1678-1741).
Eric Wyrick, the
NJSO’s concertmaster, is called on as a soloist every now and then. We heard him in Brahms’s double concerto
about six months ago. For this series he
did double duty as both the soloist in Vivaldi’s virtuoso violin piece and the
orchestra leader.
Two of the
pieces are “old,’ composed about 250 and 300 years ago, respectively. The other one pretends to be older (“ancient”),
but was written by the modern(ish) composer Ottorino Respighi, who is better
known for his “Fountains of Rome” and “Pines of Rome.” Drawing on music from the 17th and
18th centuries, Respighi produced three sets of “Ancient Airs and
Dances” and a suite title “The Birds.”
In this suite,
the first movement (Balleto, “Il Conte Orlando”) is based on a dance-like
composition from around 1600 by Simone Molinaro. The basis of the lively second movement
(Gagliarda) is attributed to Vincenzo Galilei, father of that Galilei. The third movement (Villanella)is in a 16th
century Neapolitan song form; the last (Passo mezzo e mascherada) is a
combination of an Italian form related to the French Pavane and a type of song
performedat a masked ball.
All this,
gleaned from the Program Notes, sounds a lot more complicated than the music
itself. A listener can be forgiven to
think this is really ancient music, except – perhaps – for the occasional
modern touch Respighi put in for fun.
Luigi Boccherini
is best known for the minuet from his String Quintet No. 1. Embarrassingly that’s about all I knew about
him. While he was a rather prolific
composer, with more than 20 symphonies, he was unfortunately a contemporary of
Mozart and Haydn, and his music suffered perhaps unjustified neglect as a
result. This rather short symphony has
three movements (Andante sostenuto – Allegro assai; Andantino con moto; Andante
sostenuto – Allegro con moto) and indeed sounded like an uncomplicated
Haydn. The last movement, quoting a
Chaconne by Gluck depicting Don Juan’s descent to the underworld, gives the
symphony the nickname “The House of the Devil.”
While one could see how the many descending phrases could describe a
downward journey, for the modern listener it takes a lot more to conjure up images
of the underworld.
Both pieces had
a reduced but still considerable sized orchestra (e.g, eight first violins,
three double basses.) They did well
without the help of a conductor, although the large size sometimes made precision
a bit of a challenge. While the sound
was good given our rather good seats, there wasn’t a wide range of dynamics in
the rendition.
Antonio Vivaldi
was a well-known violinist. He was also
a prolific composer: about 500 concertos survive. He wrote a cycle of 12 concertos titled “The
Contest Between Harmony and Invention,” the first four of which comprise The Four
Seasons. Each of the concertos had a sonnet
at the beginning, with each sonnet in three sections neatly corresponding to
the three movements. Vivaldi is thought
to be the authors of the sonnets for Four Seasons. An early example of program music. (The sonnets can be found on the web.)
The movements
breakdown for the four concertos are as follows: Spring (E Major): Allegro,
Largo, Allegro; Summer (G minor): Allegro non molto, Adagio, Presto; Autumn (F
Major): Allegro, Adagio molto, Allegro; Winter (F Minor): Allegro non molto,
Largo, Allegro.
A smaller ensemble
was used (six first violins and one double bass). The piece still proves quite a challenge for
the violinist. Not that it calls for a
lot of fancy techniques like spiccatos or harmonics, but the fast pace, number
of double stops, and arpeggios make it quite the virtuoso piece. Generally Wyrick did well, although his
intonation drifted occasionally, which was a bit unexpected. I don’t know what violin he plays on, but
this one certainly had a great tone.
I forgot what my
thinking was when I decided to buy these tickets; that they were on sale
probably had a lot to do with it. In
contention was also New York Philharmonic’s Rachmaninoff Festival Week 3, which
I really wanted to see after having seen the first two weeks. I decided to keep things as they were, opting
for a quieter experience. CS, who went
to the NY Phil concert, described it a thunderous, which I am sure was more fire-worky
(?) than the storm we heard in “Summer.”
No comments:
Post a Comment