Symphony Hall, Boston, First Balcony (Seat E37, $51.25)
Program
Overture to the Opera “Der Freischutz” (1820) by Carl
Maria von Weber (1786-1826).
Concerto for Piano and Orchestra, Op. 39 (1962) by Samuel
Barber (1910-1981).
Symphony No. 6 in B minor, Op. 74 “Pathetique” (1893) by
Tchaikovsky (1840-1893).
We are in the Boston area for several days to babysit our
son’s dog while he and Jess go on a short trip to Madrid. We looked around and found there were tickets
available for this concert (both Friday and Saturday.) They were discounting Friday’s tickets, but
we were a bit too tired (from driving around the area) to make the 7 pm start
time. The $45 seats (plus $6.25 fee) we
ended up getting actually had a good view of the stage. I wish we had brought our binoculars, though.
We didn’t want to pay for parking, last time we went to
Symphony Hall we parked a couple of blocks away. This time we were a good 15-minute away, but
it was a nice fall evening.
If you look at the BSO roster, for conductor they list
only two: Bernard Haitnik as Conductor Emeritus, and Seiji Ozawa as Music
Director Laureate. James Levine actually
resigned at the beginning of the season due to health reasons. I still find it interesting that there is no
mention of him that I could find in the rather thick program, perhaps the
parting wasn’t cordial?
Weber’s opera relays the story of a “free shooter” (who
shoots bullets) who sold his soul. The
overture contains themes from the opera, and the horns supposedly evoke images
of a forest (don’t they always?). Still,
the 10 minute piece is a delight, and started the concert propitiously. The Program Notes contains a detailed
description of how the piece is structured, and it is easy to follow along.
Barber is an all-American composer, born in Pennsylvania
and died in New York. This concerto was
written for John Browning, who would perform it nearly 150 times by 1969. It also won Barber a second Pulitzer Prize (which
may or may not mean a lot; Cornell Symphony’s conductor Karel Husa also won a
Pulitzer Prize for a composition that is not played much – if at all –
nowadays.)
There is no doubt that this is a virtuoso piece; indeed
even Vladimir Horowitz suggested simplifying a passage to make it more playable
at the proper tempo. Both the pianist
and the orchestra seemed to enjoy their collaboration; and Ohlsson appeared
very much in his element. Nonetheless,
sometimes the piano was simply overwhelmed: from where I sat I could see the
pianist’s hands and fingers moving frantically, but couldn’t even make out the
piano’s sound with my hands cupped behind my ears. The piece sounded great when only a limited
number of orchestra members played, and there were quite a few passages of that
nature. The composer himself provided a
description of the music for the premiere.
The three movements are (i) Allegro appassionato, Canzone, and Allegro
molto. The second movement is a rework
of a prior work for flute and piano, and highlights the flute. The 5/8 time of the last movement retains its
firm grip even as the music goes through its many gyrations.
The “Pathetique” Symphony is very much associated with the
composer’s death nine days after conducting its premiere. The second performance was part of the
memorial concert for him. Various stories have Tchaikovsky suffering from
severe depression because he was afraid his homosexuality would be exposed, and
that he drank an untreated glass of water on purpose to contract cholera. The Symphony has four movements: (i) Adagio –
Allegro non troppo; (ii) Allegro con grazia; (iii) Allegro molto vivace; and
(iv) Adagio lamentoso – Andante.
Even though many of the tunes in the Symphony sounded
familiar, I have heard the whole piece only a limited number of times. I was surprised how some themes (e.g., one in
the second movement) were used over and over, without sounding too repetitious. The third movement has a very energetic
tempo, unusual for a third movement of a Symphony; and the audience applauded
afterwards. Perhaps a bit of a faux pas,
but also an indication of how appreciate the audience was. Indeed it was an enjoyable performance. In any case, the triumphal sounding third movement
wasn’t enough to overcome the overall pathos of the piece, punctuated by the
fourth movement, which ended on pizzicato on strings against a pedal point
dotted note in the bass. I wonder which
Symphony is sadder, this one, or the one by Mahler (“Tragic,” also his sixth).
Myung-Whun Chung is the music director of the Seoul
Philharmonic, although he has spent a lot of time in the USA (New York and Los
Angeles) during his early career. He
conducted the program without music, and evoked a great sound from the
orchestra (except for the balance issue during the piano concerto.) I have heard the BSO several times (including
at Tanglewood), and thought one of their hallmarks is how precise they
are. By that measure they are a bit
sloppy today, perhaps inevitable without a permanent music director? But they certainly belong in the upper echelons
of ensembles, at least of the ones I have heard.
The Boston Globe’s Review of the program is not all that
positive. Neither is the lengthy review
by this organization called “Arts Fuse.”
There may be a bit of Levine-withdrawal at work here.
1 comment:
Awesome concert. Levine withdrawal indeed!!!
Post a Comment