Friday, December 06, 2019

Metropolitan Opera Encore Performance. Glass’s Akhnaten. December 4, 2019.

Cinemark Theater, Hazlet, NJ.  Theater 11 (Seat C10, $26.72).

Story.  After Amenhotep III dies, his son Amenhotep IV is coronated.  He changes his name Akhnaten (more commonly known as Akhenaten) and forms a monotheistic religion to worship Aten, a form of the sun god Ra.  He also builds a new city Akhetaten where he, his wife Nefertiti and their six daughters live in an insular world.  In year 17 of his reign the priests of Amon attack and eventually kill Akhnaten.  A young Tutankhamun is crowned the pharaoh and restores the old polytheistic religion.

 Program from the Dec 4 performance.  As far as I know the same cast was used for all performances this season.



Conductor – Karen Kamensek.  Amenhotep III & A Professor – Zachary James, High Priest of Amon – Aaron Blake, Queen Tye – Disella Larusdottir, Nefertiti – J’Nai Bridges.

The opera is interesting on many levels, and is also disappointing on so many levels.  Let me elaborate on that.

Akhenaten is a historical character who reigned around 1350 BC.  He is better known as the husband of Nefertiti and father of Tutankhamun (not by Nefertiti).  He did try to promulgate a monotheistic religion and was disposed because of that.  There seemed to be a concerted effort to eradicate all traces of him after he was killed, and the city Akhetaten he founded was destroyed.  Consequently little is known about him.  Some say his idea of monotheism was before his time, although Abraham was around before him.

This opera, together with Einstein on the Beach and Satyagraha, are called Glass’s trilogy where the composer explored religion (this opera), science (Einstein), and politics (Gandhi).  Glass was also in charge of the libretto, with the help of several collaborators.  With the notable exception of the “hymn” sung by Akhnaten in English, the libretto consists mostly of syllables in various ancient languages.  In most instances, no translations were needed (and they were not provided) as it was clear what the scenes were.

The staging is surreal, for lack of a better term.  A very unusual aspect is many chorus members were trained to be jugglers for this opera.  For most of the opera there are three levels where different people stand.  For Act 2 a huge sun disc was the focus of attention.  As Akhnaten sang “the hymn” he ascended a set of stairs, dressed in an orange outfit to match the color of the sun.

Orchestration was also unusual in that there were no violins; the principal viola thus got elevated to concertmaster.  The reason ostensibly was because the premiere took place in a temporary auditorium used by Stuttgart Opera during renovation, and could not accommodate a large orchestra.  That supposed gives the orchestra a warmer and darker sound.  There were no timpani for the same space-saving reason.

Costume is probably the most prominent aspect of the opera, at least in Met’s case.  This is brought home when Joyce Di Donato gave the audience a close look at Akhnaten’s robe during one of her intermission interviews.  I can’t imagine the number of man-hours (or person-hours) that went into the making of the piece.

There is also a speaking role in the opera, the ghost of Amenhotep III.

Early into the performance I began to think of Wagner’s term gesamtkunstwerk.  Let me come at it this way, I had not been sleeping well the last few days, still trying to recover from jetlag from my recent trip to Hong Kong.  If I had been listening to a recording of this opera, I would have fallen asleep perhaps 30 minutes into it.  Instead I was awake for the whole thing (lasted over 3 ½ hours with intermssions), and must attribute that to the visual effects.

The compliment is also a put down.  With Glass the listener must be patient, the music seems to get repeated over and over, and slowly (sometimes imperceptibly) moves from place to place.  All that became abundantly clear with the overture (which is helpfully labelled “prologue” on screen).  To keep things interesting, various patterns were projected onto the screen (naturally they moved slowly.)

One thing about Glass’s vocal music, it is easy to get the pitch, there are no large interval jumps, and the music is for the most part tonal.

I had seen Constanzo twice, once as Prospero in “Enchanted Island,” and more recently in “Glass Handel” about a year ago.  Generally my comments were positive.  As the lead in this opera, however, he was not quite up to the task.  Even in a movie version where sound tracks can be engineered, he voice came across as weak on many occasions.  The rendition of “the hymn” (probably based on Psalm 104) was at best adequate.  I was surprised at how often he had to breathe.

Bridges and Larusdottir as Nefertiti and Queen Tye did fine.  But most of the time they were singing simple words and – again – with no large interval jumps.

Zachary James is a bona fide opera singer, but has only a speaking role, albeit a rather substantial one.  He certainly made great use of this opportunity, providing good commentary on what is happening on stage.  He is also quite strong, having to carry Akhnaten’s body to the altar towards the end of the opera.

That the violins are missing never occurred to me during the opera.  In hindsight one could argue indeed the sound was warmer, and darker, but I am sure that effect can still be achieved with the inclusion of violins.

During one of the intermission interviews, one of the priests said he had to do a particular “word” 33 times against a chorus.  Well, it didn’t sound nearly as interesting when I heard it (admittedly I didn’t recognize the passage he was referencing until about 8 words in.)

As to the costumes, where do I start?  Take the most prominent piece, worn by the Pharaoh.  A search of the web returns many images of how a pharaoh is garbed, and nothing there came close.  It certainly was presented as a big deal.  Constanzo was hidden behind some wardrobe until the end of the first act.  He had only “loin clothes” on when unveiled, and there was an elaborate sequence to get him dressed in this robe.  I can’t imagine the effort that went into the design and making of the robe, but it certainly made no sense, and didn’t add anything to the story or the authenticity of the costumes.  Okay if the Met had tons of money to throw away, but I thought it didn’t.  What are these baby faces sewn into the robe?  They make me think of Louis XIV.  The intermission interview also led me to believe that everything about the costume would make sense at the end.  At the end the young King Tut basically was robed in a smaller version of the robe, so I wasn’t blown away by how clever the whole thing was.

While Amenhotep III’s costume isn’t as ridiculous, his wrist bands consist of watches, Rolexes I presume, as it is a sponsor.  Would be okay if we want to make the opera a comedy, and in any case the watches are not visible to most people in a live performance anyway.

I can make similar remarks about the jugglers.  Why are they put there?  One could argue some drawings from that period may show jugglers during those days, but again they add nothing to the story.  Visually they do provide some distraction so the audience may not notice the deficiencies of other aspects of the opera.  (There, a praise and a pan.)

The Synopsis devoted many words on how Amenhotep III's body was prepared for burial, including the removal of his organs.  Let's just say the macabre in me wasn't satisfied at all.

This series constitutes Karen Kamensek’s debut at the Met.  She claims Glass is fine with her interpretation, which I don’t dispute, and that much concentration is needed, (otherwise you may skip a whole page and no one notices it.)

 Akhnaten flanked by Nefertiti (on his right) and Queen Tye.  Picture from Met website.

 Akhnaten died at the end of the opera, and his clothes were removed before burial clothes were wrapped around the body.  So Constanzo put on the robe for the curtain call.

Karen Kamensek the conductor.

To sum up, this is an opera that probably can’t thrive on the music and the drama alone, and throwing a lot of distraction into the production may or may not enhance the audience experience.  Later this season we will see another new production: Porgy and Bess by Gershwin.  All the shows are sold out (although they are now putting out additional performances), I wonder how I would react to it.

I met up with Roger H at the Cheesequake Rest Area and then rushed to Hazlet.  The theater seats about 110, the audience numbered about 30, it was a quiet day in the entire cinema complex.  I do hope they continue to have these shows

No comments: