Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Philharmonia Orchestra – Esa-Pekka Salonen, conductor; Truls Mork, cello. March 10, 2019.


David Geffen Hall at Lincoln Center.  Orchestra (Seat G101, $66).

Program
The Oceanides (1914) by Sibelius (1865-1957).
Cello Concerto (2016) by Salonen (b. 1958).
The Firebird (1909-10) by Stravinsky (1882-1971).

The Playbill nonchalantly described the first half of the program as being written by two Finnish composers, about 100 years apart.  What it failed to mention – probably because it was too obvious – was that the younger composer would be conducting his own work, and that he could trace his composition heritage to Sibelius.

Tonight’s Cello concerto was written for Yo-Yo Ma, which he premiered with Salonen in 2017, with the Chicago Symphony.  Overall it was an exciting piece to listen to, especially in the wonderful hands of Truls Mork and under the baton of Salonen.  Salonen describes the first movement as “evolving from ‘chaos’ and becoming like a comet,” and that the concerto explores “the concept of a virtuoso operating at the very limits of what is physically (and sometimes mentally) possible.”

As to the first point, a program of the music doesn’t necessarily translate into how a listener hears the music.  Of course one can make the case of chaos turning into order, and how “a moving object is emulated by other lines … A bit like a comet’s tail.”  But what I heard was a lot more than that; at a minimum, the orchestra/sections at times took the lead, and at times there was quite a bit of conversation.

Not being a cello player, I do not know all the virtuoso techniques one can bring to the instrument.  As a string player, I do know how difficult harmonics, glissandos, high registers, large intervals, and left-hand pizzicatos are.  All these, and more, were present in the concerto.  Not only that, some of these passages were so long that they no doubted tested the stamina and concentration of the soloist, and the orchestra, for that matter.

In that sense, Mork – a Norwegian – did an excellent job.  He needed the music (who wouldn’t?), and there were precarious occasions when the music was about to fall off the stand.  My seat in Row G gave me an excellent view of how he methodically tackled the music, and how he worked against a large orchestra.  Salonen needed the music also.

Several interesting aspects.  A set of drums was placed up front, and a percussionist came out after the first movement to hit them (for lack of a better term).  He also had some “rattles” that he would shake.  There was a speaker placed in the front also, I assume it was used to broadcast some preprogrammed music that sounded like bird calls.  (I am not sure if it was bird calls, but that seems to be a Finnish favorite.)  The concerto is “performed in three movements” which are fast, slow, fast; naturally there are slow passages in the fast movements, and vice versa.  A lot of tremolo was used in the orchestra strings.  (This turns out to be true of both nights’ programs.)

Truls Mork and Esa-Pekka Salonen after performing the Salonen Cello Concerto.  Notice the drums on the right, and the speaker between Mork and Salonen, partially blocked by the music stand for the soloist.

I hadn’t taken notes during a concert for a long time, but couldn’t help myself when the second movement started: slow movement begins with a bang, Mork has great techniques and is precise (minor intonation programs on rare occasions), the harmonization – especially by the flute – produces an interesting effect, demonstrates the sounds a cello can make, glissandos sound like ghosts wailing, cacophony plus drums.

What words did I conclude my notetaking with?  Instrument abuse and mental torture.  Perhaps that what Salonen meant in the quote cited above?  As a first time listener, there were several occasions I wanted that passage to end, not only because I wondered – for instance – how many glissandos on how many strings does one need, but that do we need to see if the musician would “fail” after – say – five tries.  Bottom line?  If given a chance, I would listen to it again.

The concert began with a short piece by Sibelius.  The tone poem Oceanides is based on Greek myth and describes the thousands of sea nymphs born to Oceanus and Tethys, his sister.  Salonen put the orchestra “volume control” to great use in describing what must be cresting and ebbing of these great waves.  Sibelius wrote this for the Norfolk Music Festival in 1914, and travelled to Connecticut to conduct it, collecting an honorary degree from Yale in the process.

I wish I had studied the Firebird before attending this concert.  That would have made the program much more interesting.  As it was, I needed the anchor provided by the familiar tunes to follow the program along.  Again the piece was tailor-made (not that Stravinsky was thinking about the Philharmonia Orchestra) for the abilities of this orchestra.  One remark I wanted to make: as exciting as the passage “Infernal Dance” was, it reminded me of how Trifonov did that by himself, on a piano.

After the Firebird. He can make a deep bow.

Salonen conducts with precision and attention to details.  He will become the music director of San Francisco Symphony in 2020, succeeding Michael Tilson Thomas.

The program lasted until 10:15 pm, so I had to take a late train home, getting in a little before 12:30 am.

No comments: