Prudential Hall
at NJPAC. First Tier (Seat B8, $37.50).
Program
Orchestra
Variations (1958) by Copland (1900-1990).
Inscape (1967)
by Copland.
Piano Concerto (1927)
by Copland.
Symphony No. 2
in C major, Op. 61 (1846) by Schumann (1810-1856).
While surfing
Goldstar.com a couple of weeks ago, I found out tickets for this concert were
offered at a 50% discount. A no-brainer
as SFS and MTT are on the program.
Thomas actually
described the first two pieces before they were performed. I vaguely remember the Orchestra Variations
can be called a concerto for the orchestra, and Inscape as starting on a
11-note chord, then resolving into simpler music for various parts of the
orchestra, and ending on the same 11-note chord again.
If I have to
name two Copland works, they would be Appalachian Springs (1944) and Billy the
Kid (1938). Both these works predate the
first two pieces in the program, and the evolution of Copland as a composer
clearly shows.
Copland’s
description of Variations, cited in the Program Notes, is simple enough: a
theme of dramatic characters followed by 20 variations and a coda. The annotator adds more, grouping the piece
into “Chapter 1” (through the 10th variation), a slow movement (11),
a scherzo (12-18), section of increasing speed (19-22), and a “magnificent
spare-textured coda.” All well and good,
except the theme sounded more complicated than I thought, and I gave up on
counting the variations after a few. I
suspect this music is more interesting studied on paper than heard with the
ear. The entire piece lasted perhaps 12
minutes, so things were going at a fast clip.
There are 12
notes in the chromatic scale, so I naturally wonder which note was skipped in
the initial chord (calling it a chord is a bit of a stretch, in my
opinion.) Interestingly the chord
sounded much more harmonious than I would expect. I like the intervening passages that seemed
to probe different aspects of new music.
A search of the
web indicated some suspected Copland, whose music had been lyrical, was trying
to stay relevant with his exploration of new styles of music writing. The premiere of Inscape – commissioned by the
New York Philharmonic and conducted by Leonard Bersetein – was not
well-received. I, on the other hand,
would only attribute the “head-scratching” to my lack of understanding.
In contrast, the
piano concerto was written early in Copland’s career, and was much easier to
appreciate. It consists of two movements
played without pause: Andante sostenuto, and Molto moderato (molto rubato) –
Allegro vivace. Not only did it sound
like the Copland I know, to me the jazz and “American” elements in the music
made it sound like Gershwin on many occasions.
The Program Notes contains the composer description of the music, and it
is relatively easy to follow. This turns
out to be the last composition Copland wrote in this style, remarking that
American music could not possibly be confined to two dominant moods: the blues
and the snappy number.
Inon Barnatan
probably is an up-and-coming pianist, having been retained as NY Philharmonic’s
artist-in-association. He put in a
delightful performance, often masquerading himself as a jazz pianist
(successfully, I might add.) We heard
him last year performing Ravel’s F with the NY Philharmonic.
Curtain Call, Barnatan and Thomas.
The other
interesting aspect of the first two pieces is the number of percussionists they
called for; at one point I counted six of them.
I am not
familiar with Schumann’s second symphony, even though I had heard it a couple
of times in the past few years. The
Program Notes describes this tribute to Bach with the notes
B-flat/A/C/B-natural. I tried very hard
to listen for it, but failed.
The San
Francisco Symphony is a large organization.
In addition to the many percussionists, they also have large sections –
I counted 14 first violins, roster says 18.
They sounded precise, and had good dynamics. Unfortunately the acoustics
at our seats were a bit flat, so I couldn’t characterize the sound. The played the same program at Carnegie Hall
twice before coming to NJPAC. Attendance
was okay, although there were quite a few empty seats in Tier 1.
The New York Times review is of the Carnegie Hall performance. It is generally positive, and provides more background on Copland's works. The review did complain that the Schumann reading was a bit on the "sober" side.
No comments:
Post a Comment