Metropolitan
Opera at Lincoln Center. Balcony (Seat
B114, $147.50.)
Story. Zurga is elected the leader of his fishing
village. His childhood friend Nadir
returns and they renew their friendship.
The two had a fallout because they fell in love with the same Hindu
priestess. Leila, whose identity is
hidden behind a veil, comes to the village to help calm the seas. Nadir recognizes Leila as the priestess he
used to love, and the two meet illicitly.
When the two are discovered, Zurga, not knowing Leila’s identity, first
sentences them to death but then relents.
When Leila’s veil is torn off, Zurga becomes upset and decrees the two
should die. As Zurga struggles with his
decision after he has calmed down, Leila comes to see him to beg for mercy,
which he refuses as he is jealous of Nadir.
As Leila is led away, she gives a pearl to a young diver to return to
her mother. It turns out Leila saved
Zurga as a child and gave Leila this necklace in appreciation. As the villagers prepare to burn the couple
to death, Zurga sets the village on fire and tells the villagers that they must
go back to save their belongings. He
stays behind after he frees Leila and Nadir.
Conductor –
Gianandrea Noseda; Zurga – Mariusz Kwiecien, Nadir – Matthew Polenzani, Leila,
Diana Damrau.
I saw this opera
in Australia many years ago, before my blogging days. Every now and then I would hear “the duet” broadcast
on classical stations, and wonder why I have not had a chance to see it. This performance was the Met’s 10th
performance in its entire history, and the Playbill gives various reasons why
the opera is more popular than it should be.
Some attribute it to the thin story line, some to Bizet being “accused”
of copying other composers (Wagner, for instance.)
First, I am glad
we caught it. We came back from Hong
Kong the day before, after a 15-hour flight made more unbearable by delays due
to problems in the luggage hold, and being completely packed. Yet I stayed quite awake, and so did
Anne. That the opera is short helps – it’s
about two hours, plus an intermission.
Also, the three top singers did an overall superb job. Polenzani put in
a great performance, his voice projecting clearly and urgently all the
time. Kwiecien as Zurga was
dependable. The slight disappointment is
Damrau didn’t do as well as thought she could.
On a few occasions she seemed unsteady.
The orchestra
music was generally pleasant and supported the story well. While the tunes may not be as catchy as those
in Carmen, but there are many enjoyable solos, duets, and choral numbers. I do think the violin passage introducing
Leila in Act 1 was horribly botched. The
orchestra is on the small side.
Bizet had the
opera setting in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) around 1800 (perhaps), but the producers
have chosen to leave the time undefined, and the location as simply a village
in the Far East. I always scratch my
head when people do that, particularly so in this case as it can be assumed
very few people have seen this opera before.
If one is to be sensitive, won’t all the references to Brahma and Shiva
offend some people? One could also argue
the costumes would insult an entire region, if one is so inclined. And in Act 3 we have this specter of an old
black and white TV (which turned on for a few seconds) and a laptop.
However, there
is a lot to be said about the set design.
When the opera began, bubbles were projected onto a mesh screen behind
which are people on harnesses masquerading as divers, to good effect. The village, with houses and piers on stilts
over a bay, looks realistic. The small
houses in the back are there probably as a perspective trick, but fool no
one. Interesting, they have divers
emerging from the sea and climbing into boats.
The waves probably were undulating cloth, but the effect was quite magical.
This must be one of the longest New York Times reviews ever written. Other a few remarks about the shortcomings of the work, he proceeds to describe the story in detail, sings praises to the production team, the solosist, the chorus, and the conductor. Evidently Bizet wasn't sure how this story ends is satisfactory, the reviewer's response is this Met performance will remove any doubts he might have.
This must be one of the longest New York Times reviews ever written. Other a few remarks about the shortcomings of the work, he proceeds to describe the story in detail, sings praises to the production team, the solosist, the chorus, and the conductor. Evidently Bizet wasn't sure how this story ends is satisfactory, the reviewer's response is this Met performance will remove any doubts he might have.
Turns out during
on upcoming trip to Australia this opera will be staged at the Sydney Opera
House. We will probably get tickets to
see how different the two companies approach this.
We had to rush
into the city, I ate a burger before I met up with Anne at the Jersey City PATH
station, she bought a sandwich at the venue.
No comments:
Post a Comment