Metropolitan
Opera at Lincoln Center. Orchestra (Seat
AA35, $25).
Story. See previous post.
Conductor –
Paolo Carignani; Marcello – Levente Molnar, Rodolfo – Ramon Vargas, Colline –
Christian Van Horn, Schaunard – Alexey Lavrov, Mimi – Barbara Frittoli, Musetta
– Ana Maria Martinez.
Both Anne and I
are quite sure we have seen this opera multiple times, but there is only one
entry in this blog on this opera, although my first entry ever (in 2005)
mentioned prior experience with La Boheme. We are quite sure this would be our
first encounter with it at the Met.
And this was a
great experience. Our seats were towards
the rear of the orchestra section, but we could hear the singers clearly,
although several of them came across as a bit weak. One of the “lesser characters” (I couldn’t
tell if it was Colline or Schaunard) did exceptionally well.
The only name I
recognize from the roster is Vargas. He
used to be a regular at the Met (we are talking perhaps more than 10 years ago)
but now seems to appear less frequently.
While his voice was often weak, he certainly hit the notes accurately,
and had great stage presence. While
Frittoli would never be mistaken for someone dying of tuberculosis, she managed
to make Mimi fragile, resolved, and sympathetic as the opera progressed. Musetta the flirt is oftentimes the
show-stealer, with the well-known aria “Quando m’en vo” one of the more
hummable tunes; tonight Martinez couldn’t quite pull that off, although she did
quite well. Marcello provided support,
both in the singing and in the story.
Puccini often
put the melody in the orchestra; Act 4 had a lot of passages like this with the
voices in “supporting” roles. Today that
combination often came across as a bit chaotic and thus a disappointment. Otherwise the orchestra was as superb as it
was last week during Tosca.
The Franco
Zeffirelli-designed set has been in use since 1981. Acts 1 and 4 take place in the rooftop
apartment (garret) occupied by the men.
It was functional, but I thought they could sacrifice a bit of
perspective so more of the audience can see what is happening. Act 3 was billed as “a toll-gate on the edge of
Paris,” but I could find no evidence of that.
The softly falling snow on a slope, with an inn nearby, made for a
beautiful sight though. I am sure the
Playbill author had Act 2 in mind when he/she called this a “spectacular
production.” Indeed the scenery is complicated:
lots of houses, café Momus, Latin Quarter, thoroughfare, and parade route are
all represented here. To me it was
simply confusing. From where we sat it
usually took a while for us to find out where the principals were singing. All that distraction may be the reason why I
didn’t find Musetta as compelling as she could be.
There are several
points raised in the Playbill that I resonate a lot with. One was how many of the melodies were built
incrementally with small intervals; while one could debate whether this was really
the case, there is not debate that the tunes carry some interesting yet
difficult-to-pinpoint characteristics. A
second point was how masters (composers and lyricists) can weave a great
masterpiece from a simple story of poverty, love, and loss. I could wax nostalgic and say everyone is
special … One new discovery (or re-discovery) for me was how at the end Rodolfo
and Mimi quoted the exact words from their first encounter (“Che Gelida Manina”
and “Si, mi chiamano Mimi”). It ended
the same way it began, and was very effective despite the simplicity of the
conversation. (I switched to Italian subtitles towards the end, and remembered
the names of the two arias in Italian.)
My last
encounter with the opera was in Australia, about three years ago. While I don’t remember the specific
experience, I did say it was one of the best I have been from that
company. While I must give the nod to
tonight’s performance, still Opera Australia had a lot to be proud of.
Our tickets were
again rush tickets. The attendance was
quite a bit better than last week’s for Tosca.
This run began in November 23, and as of today (12/11) still has 12 more
performances to go. That is quite
ambitious, even for the most staged opera in Met history.
Surprisingly, the New York Times reviewer saw the production with the same cast as we did. Her words were quite brutal: after-thought, neither ... was able to summon it, wooden efficiency. The blow is highlighted by the praise she heaped on the secondary actors.
No comments:
Post a Comment