David Geffen
Hall at Lincoln Center, Orchestra (Seat V105, $69.50.)
Program
Tragic Overture,
Op. 81 (1880) by Brahms (1833-97).
Canta-Concerto
(2014) by Marc Neikrug (b. 1946).
Concerto No. 2
in B-flat major for piano and orchestra, Op. 83 (1878-81) by Brahms.
This was our
first concert of the season. After
having attended three out-of-town concerts, I was ready to “go home” to more
familiar surroundings.
Two of the
pieces are by Brahms. The Overture was
written by the composer during his summer vacation at Bad Ischl. The Playbill says Brahms said the piece could
be called either “dramatic” or “tragic.”
Various commentators have attributed a story to the music, including
Goethe’s Faust. The composer said there
was none – but evidently no one knows for sure if he was serious.
The more
interesting point made in the Playbill is that “The Academic Overture” was
written at about the same time, and stands in contrast to Tragic. One would think it would be illuminating to
hear the two overtures in quick succession, but not today.
The orchestra
put in a superb performance. They were
precise, had great dynamics, and generally produced a wonderful sound. I wouldn’t have used the word “tragic” to
describe it; and tried as I did, I couldn’t hear any Faust in it either.
Before playing
the Canta-Concerto, Gilbert and the composer came out and talked for a
bit. This was the world premiere of the
composition, and it was commissioned by the New York Philharmonic. Indeed one wonders why the voice is seldom
used as a “solo instrument” since a lot of soloists are asked to make their
instruments sing like a voice. The
Playbill mentions one such composition from 1943, written by the Russian
composer Gliere, titled “Concerto for Coloratura Soprano and Orchestra.” I thought it was bad form when Neikrug said “I
can say that, since the composer is dead: it isn’t very good.” The vocal solo
utilizes different sounds (proto-language) that Gilbert characterized as “gibberish,”
but he qualified that by saying its like listening to an opera in Czech without
subtitles, one can still tell there is emotion in the sound.
The 25-minute
work is in four movements: (I) Moderato q=72, (II) Mosso q=72, (III) Adagio
q=54, (IV) Vivo q=92. The second
movement is especially short.
It may be unfair
to make an assessment after one hearing, and of a new genre at that. But I must say I am tempted to use the same
words to describe this piece as Neikrug used for Gliere’s piece. It is difficult enough to follow the music,
but the various sounds made by the soloist were simply too distracting for me
to focus on the overall structure of the movements. While my appreciation of contemporary music
is usually at the “I can tolerate it” level, every now and then there are
pieces I would like to hear again to get a better understanding. There is no desire in this instance. I also would take issue with Gilbert’s
statement. In the case of an opera the listener
generally has some idea of the storyline and with the help of the action and
scenary can associate the emotion expressed in the voice with what is happening
in the story (although in my experience, often wrong.) Here there is no story. I do wonder how the music would come across
if a regular instrument (say a flute) is used.
Sasha Cooke has
a great voice that projects well. I just
wished she had done something in the more traditional repertoire – say Britten. I heard her a couple of years back in Britten’s
Spring Symphony. To use the voice as an
instrument and not take advantage of its ability to speak is such a waste.
Brahms’s second
piano concerto is often called “serene and warm.” To me those adjectives apply only when this
work is compared with his first concerto.
This is especially true with how the two pieces begin: one with the roll
of the timpani followed by the full orchestra, the other with a (soft) horn
introduction. Of course in the slow
movement there is this lovely tune played by the cello, which Carter Brey just
nailed. (The orchestra seating was rearranged
so the cello section was on the outside.)
I have always
found Emanuel Ax’s playing thoughtful, and have been amazed how he can tell a
story with how he puts the performance together. He did that tonight, but the performance was
a notch below his usual high standard: at times the sound was a bit muddled,
and the music sometimes didn’t seem to go try to go anywhere. But we are talking about an “A” performance
instead of an “A+” one here.
It was good to
see the familiar faces, and the few new ones.
In the Bass section there is a young Chinese woman listed as “replacement/extra.” Case Scaglione, who just got promoted to Associate
Conductor recently, is gone.
The most obvious
change was of course the new concertmaster, Frank Huang. We had seem him a couple of times last year
when he was auditioning for the job. He
seemed to enjoy himself, and well he should.
Still moved around a bit much by Dicterow standards, perhaps the
audience will get used to that. It is
noteworthy (to me at least) that he stayed during Ax’s performance. There were no solo passages for him, so I
looked up the New York Times review for last week’s performance, where the
concertmaster had considerable playtime as Pauline in Strauss’s “Ein
Heldenleben.” The reviewer had something
good to say about him in an otherwise critical review of the program.
We stopped by
Ellie’s place before going into the city via PATH and the subway. I stepped into one of these pools from the
recent rains on the sidewalk, the wet shoe felt quite uncomfortable
afterwards. It was about 11:45 pm when
we got home.
[Note on October 4: Here is the New York Times review. The reviewer had a lot of good things to say about the program.]
[Note on October 4: Here is the New York Times review. The reviewer had a lot of good things to say about the program.]
No comments:
Post a Comment