Avery Fisher Hall at Lincoln Center, Orchestra (Seat
R111, $68.50).
Program
Alborada del gracioso (Dawn Song of the Jester)
(1904-05/orch. 1918) by Ravel (1875-1937).
Symphonic Dances from West Side Story (1961) by Bernstein
(1918-90).
Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor, Op. 23 (1874-75,
1889) by Tchaikovsky (1840-93).
This was the first concert for the season for which we
had tickets. Anne had to be Washington
DC for a meeting (despite the government shut-down), so I went by myself. The 5:25 pm train got me into town early
enough that I managed to exchange some future tickets for which we had schedule
conflicts.
The most interesting aspect about the Ravel piece is that
it doesn’t sound like Ravel at all. (I
am making the statement with full knowledge that my exposure to Ravel is quite
limited.) As described in the program
notes, the piece is very Spanish in character.
Ravel’s link to Spain evidently was through his mother who spent her
youth in Madrid.
Regardless, this “song” was originally a movement in
Ravel’s Miroirs Suite for the piano, and Diaghilev commissioned the composer to
create an orchestral version for a ballet.
The performance showcased New York Philharmonic’s ability to have a wide
dynamic range. As to the interpretation,
there is an interesting excerpt in the Program Notes about the piano version:
it may be the most difficult piece technically, and Ravel wanted it played
tautly and in a lively tempo. The
orchestral version certainly sounded difficult enough, and was played at a
respectable pace. However, it was more
along the lines of “caution occasioned by the difficulty of the work.”
West Side Story is variation on the theme of Romeo and
Juliet. Instead of Capulets and
Montagues we have rival New York City gangs; at the end only one of the
protagonists (Tony) dies while Maria survives.
The musical opened in 1957, and in 1961 Bernstein extracted nine
sections to assemble into tonight’s set of Symphonic Dances, including the most
popular tunes “Somewhere” and “Maria.”
The sections are: Prologue (Allegro moderato); “Somewhere” (Adagio);
Scherzo (Vivace leggiero); Mambo (Presto); Cha-Cha (Andantino con grazia);
Meeting Scene (Meno moss); “Cool” Fugue (Allegretto); Rumble (Molto allegro);
and Finale (Adagio). Per the Program
Notes, the uninterrupted sequence is derived from a strictly musical rationale;
I imagine that also means it is not a synopsis of the plot.
As far as I know, West Side Story is rarely staged, and I
have never had the chance to see it live.
I am, however, familiar with the two tunes, and appreciated them. The piece is 22 minutes in duration, and the
phrases “too long,” “too repetitive,” and “too loud” all came to mind. Speaking of loud: at times I really worried
about the harm done to the players (not just our ear-plug wearing violist.)
During the intermission I chatted briefly with the
gentleman sitting next to me (he got the seat we returned.) He was saying Gilbert is a bit too precise
for his taste, and thus far I agreed with him.
Actually, I still recall how disappointed I was with the first concert
of the last New York Philharmonic season.
And by this time I was worried tonight was going to be a repeat of that
evening.
So it was a good thing that Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto
was on the menu after the intermission.
It certainly salvaged the overall concert.
A few things I learned from the Program Notes that are
worth repeating. First is that
Tchaikovsky wasn’t “much of a pianist” and thus solicited the help of Nikolai
Rubinstein on technical matters. And it
shared the same fate as the Violin Concerto (Leopold Auer in that case):
Rubinstein pronounced it worthless and unplayable. Tchaikovsky decided to publish the piece
anyway, and premiered it in Boston with Hans von Bulow at an American
Chickering piano and an orchestra of freelancers conducted by Benjamin Johnson
Lang (described as “long-forgotten”). He
also changed the dedication to von Bulow.
The piece was a sensation. Rubinstein
did come around and led the piece in Moscow in late 1875; and Tchaikovsky also
revised the score, twice.
We have heard Bronfman before on many occasions, and
admire his skills as a technician and (most of the time) his interpretation as
a musician. Tonight he did well on both
counts.
It is always dangerous to perform a familiar piece of
music since in the listener’s mind there may be an “idealized” version of how
it should be placed. And indeed there
are variations in the tempo of certain measures that I didn’t expect. In tonight’s case they made the music more
interesting. And familiar doesn’t mean
easy, and there are challenging passages in the music (at least for a non-piano
player like me.) Bronfman dispatched
those brilliantly. It was in a way that
kept me on the edge of my seat, though – and I kept thinking how Trifonov’s
stab at difficult runs did not worry me.
The applause afterwards was thunderous, and well-deserved.
In any case, afterwards my neighbor and I both agreed it
was appropriately wild.
Alan Gilbert usually writes a couple of paragraphs on the
programs he leads. He has a lot of
praise for Bronfman and expresses how much they enjoy their collaboration. All good.
He also talks about their warm and natural relationship offstage,
sharing a love of good food and wine. I
must say on that he is right on, more so for Bronfman than himself.
This was an overall good evening, although I expected
more.
Note added 10/9/2013. I found out I didn't immediately look for a New York Times review. And here it is.
Note added 10/9/2013. I found out I didn't immediately look for a New York Times review. And here it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment