Teatro dell’Opera, Rome. PLATEA (Row 10, Seat 13, Euro 115).
Conductor – Riccardo Muti; Nabucodonosor – Luca Salsi,
Ismaele – Francesco Meli, Zaccaria – Riccardo Zanellato, Abigaille – Tatiana Serjan,
Fenena – Sonia Ganassi, Il Gran Sacerdote di Belo – Luca Dall’Amico.
Story. See
previous post.
We are on a family trip to Italy, Anne and I don’t have a
lot planned other than to be with our children, their spouses, and our 6-month
old granddaughter. I found out a couple
of months ago that this was going to be on during our short stay in Rome. I tried on many occasions to book tickets
over the web with my limited Italian skills, but always got to a “system down”
page at the end. On our day of arrival
in Rome (July 17) we went to the Opera House right after we checked into the
hotel – it is a 5 minute walk – and there were four seats left, all at
E115. While they were among the more
expensive seats for the theater, we thought it was a bargain since we were in
the 10th row, slightly off to the left. Turns out from what we would call the
Orchestra section we couldn’t see the orchestra, but we had a good view of the
conductor. To our chagrin, but not
surprise, none of our children wanted to come.
My expectation was this would be as Italian as things go:
Italian conductor, Italian composer, and an opera with a tune (Hebrew Slave
Chorus) very much identified by Italians.
There was one more Italian aspect that I hadn’t figured in: an Italian
audience. They seemed to have little qualms
with whispering (as the saying goes, not as quietly as they think they do,) nor
with taking pictures during the performance. I am sure the flashes were unintentional. They do seem to dress up more properly than a
typical Metropolitan Opera audience. I
can’t figure out how the men in suits keep their cool in this warm weather
(90s).
Being “very Italian” would mean the program is in
Italian, and the surtitles would be in Italian.
That was okay. While I would love
to understand the words as they were being sung, I did read up on the synopsis
so I could basically tell what was going on.
Of course any humor or momentary tension would have been lost on me.
Overall, we enjoyed the performance and the
experience. Most of Verdi’s operas
contain many lyrical tunes, this one is non exception. The Hebrew Slave Chorus (va, pensiero) is
always enjoyable. We got to see Muti as
an opera conductor for the first time.
One would never expect how ornate the opera house is, especially given
how unassuming and simplistic the façade is.
We were quite impressed and couldn’t resist taking a few pictures (not
during the performance, I haste to add.)
Now the nitpicking – some nits may have hatched into lice
already, actually. I must start with the
sets, or lack thereof. Act I shows some
things dropping down from the ceiling onto a conical pile on the stage. Even now I can’t imagine what that is supposed
to be. There are some background panels:
one showing an overcast sky with the sun peeking through, the other with the
silhouettes of four trees that got doubled to eight for the last Act, the
significance of which also escapes me.
Oh, there are also these panels to represent the temple/palace.
The singing was generally okay. Other than the time in Sydney watching Madama
Butterfly, I had never had a seat that close to the stage, so I certainly could
hear the singers very well. Those who
think the acoustics is great high up in the theater, while correct, perhaps have
never sit up front before. However, to
an amateur like me, most voices don’t have the refined quality I’d come to
expect from opera singers. One exception
for me was Abigaille sung by the Russian Tatiana Serjan. When I heard Maria Guleghina singing the same
role at the Met in October 2011, my complaint was that she had only one volume:
loud. Here Serjan demonstrated that
Abigaille can be wistful as well. I
particularly admire her courage in singing in Italian in front of this
audience.
Another aspect of opera performance that I am beginning
to appreciate is how engaged the conductor is with the vocal parts. Muti was no
exception. He did most of the conducting
sitting down, except when he had to cue in the voices, at which times he would
stand up. As far as I could tell, he
used very precise gestures to shape the lines, and even to cue the
syllables. (Anne thought it wasn’t
precise enough.)
That makes the Hebrew Slave Chorus particularly
disappointing. I was closed to being
shocked how imprecise the chorus members were in this relatively simple
tune. Despite my trying to just enjoy
the moment, I couldn’t help noticing the many instances where some voices would
come in early (or others coming in late.)
The applause afterwards lasted forever, Muti finally said something to
the audience, and redid the number. This
time around I tried to follow Muti’s movements and really thought I could
follow him along – of course lip sync and actual singing are two different
things. And the chorus also did better.
With the encore of this number, and with two
intermissions, the 2 hour opera turned into a much longer than expected
event. We didn’t get back to the hotel
room until after midnight. We told our
children we should be back by 11:15 pm, that got them a bit worried. It was amazing that people were still having
dinner so late on a weeknight.
We were glad we went.
Anne and I actually had dinner by ourselves (not quite by design) before
the show. Today was our 37th wedding
anniversary.
1 comment:
I went to the one on 16 June. Being new opera I found the first act boring and nodded off a bit :) I, like everyone else, liked the 'chorus of hebrew slaves' part and what you experienced is exactly what happened two night prior :)
Post a Comment