Boston Symphony Hall. Center Balcony (Seat F28, $76).
Program - Decoding Shostakovich, Orchestra Program 5.
Violin Concerto No. 1 in A minor, Op. 77[99] (1948) by Shostakovich (1906-1975).
Symphony No. 8 in C minor, Op. 65 (1943).
Why does the violin concerto have two opus numbers?
We were in the area for the NEC Prep concert earlier today, so we also bought tickets for this evening's BSO concert. It was the conclusion of their "Decoding Shostakovich" Festival. In addition to the five BSO concerts (this would be the last), there were also ensemble performances, and talks. Associating Shostakovich with "Festival" is a bit strange (so is Mahler), the talks and concerts (and their accompanying notes) probably would add a lot of appreciation to the hitherto casual listener. The entire festival can be overwhelming: in my case, two concerts 4 pieces were more than enough to keep track of. It still does not explain why in one program Uchida played Beethoven's 4th piano concerto. Great performance, no doubt, but how did they hang together? (Perhaps Program Notes for that concert would explain, and didn't even need six degrees of separation. I skimmed over the Notes for that program - still available on line on 5/8/2025 - and didn't see any connection mentioned.)
I remember the name Baiba Skride from a concert in Taipei I attended. That was many years ago (2014), she played Brahms's violin concerto. Checking on my blog entry for that event, I enjoyed that performance.
Rightly or wrongly, whenever I hear a Shostakovich piece I want to know if Shostakovich was being "patriotic," or was he expressing dissent, and whether the expressed patriotism is actually mockery in disguise. It is hard to tell for the piece. That it was first performed in 1955, several years before it was written, resulted in many musicologists (or even historians) to think there was a political message that could only be publicized after Stalin's death in 1953. Some attribute the delay to Oistrakh, to whom the concerto was dedicated. Today's Program Notes added the possibility that the Jewish flavor of the piece caused the delay as the USSR turned quite antisemitic at that time.
Indeed I noted quite a bit of Jewishness in the concerto. Shostakovich reportedly said "the distinguishing feature of Jewish music is the ability to build a jolly melody on sad intonations." I can convince myself I experienced that; but nothing like what one gets with "Fiddler on the Roof".
The theme DSCH is in the concerto; but I didn't get it. It has four movements: (1) Nocturne. Moderato (2) Scherzo. Allegro (3) Passacaglia. Andante; and (4) Burlesque. Allegro con brio. And a technically difficult cadenza between the last movements. The Program Notes also described the moods and techniques involved. While useful in appreciating the virtuosity of the soloist and the orchestra (perhaps even the composer), I found them not very helping for a first time listener.
But I am not a first time listener. There are three other entries in this blog, the most recent one being two years ago. While I wasn't blown away by that one, I was quite impressed with the prior ones (2009 and 2014). My experience with the violin concerto thus contrasts unfavorably with that with the first cello concerto. And I am a lot more familiar with the violin.
In contrast, the message of the eighth symphony was much clearer. It has five movements: Adagio; Allegretto; Allegro non troppo - Largo - Allegretto. As the dashes indicate, there are no pauses between the last three movements. The long first movement represents the evil power of militarism, and a string motive reappears in subsequent movements to give coherence to the music. The second movement provides music for a march, but one devoid of humanity. The third movement is a dance of death, with its "theme" a descending octave shriek. The fourth movement evokes a requiem for the countless dead with some ideas from the first movement reprised over a passacaglia repeated 11 times. (All this paraphrased from a few paragraphs in the Program Notes.)
Even though I didn't get all the specifics, the description helped tremendously my appreciation the performance. Some hints on what the composer was trying to say go a long way. I couldn't find a prior reference to this symphony in this blog; this makes it even more amazing. Since the descriptions of the concerto and symphony were written by the same author, it could be it's difficult to make such associations with the violin concerto. (I am assuming Shostakovich didn't provide any notes to interpret the symphony.)
Nelsons is quite good with acknowledging the contributions of the musicians in the orchestra. Here it was the first violin section.
The Program says the symphony is 66 minutes long. It ended up being 75. The concert started only a few minutes late (7:38pm?), and ended at 10:30 pm or so.
We stopped by the Charlestown soccer field to watch part of Emmie's game, and took an Uber to the Symphony Hall area, and had dinner before the concert started. Joe came by to pick us up afterwards. The afternoon saw rain on and off, sometimes heavy, we managed to dodge most of it.