David Geffen Hall at Lincoln Center. Orchestra (Seat AA103, $136).
Joshua Bell after performing Dvorak's violin concerto, with Rustioni looking on.
Program
Overture to The Merchant of Venice (1933) by Castelnuovo-Tedesco (1895-1968).
Violin Concerto in A minor, Op. 53 (1879, rev. 1880 ad 1882) by Dvorak (1841-1904).
Symphony No. 4 in F minor, Op. 36 (1877-78) by Tchaikovsky (1840-93).
Today's program paralleled yesterdays: a (relatively) modern piece, a soloist, and a symphonic composition. Yesterday's solo piece was not nearly as well-known as today's; and - good as Leonard may be - Bell certainly has a "better" reputation. He probably will be on many people's "top 10" list while Leonard may not make a similar cut. That's reflected in the price also (for similar seats). Tchaikovsky's symphony is probably programmed more often than Strauss's Zarathustra.
Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco emigrated to the United States to escape Fascism in the 1940s. He already had a thriving career as writer of film scores in Italy by that time. The Merchant of Venice (which I have not read, and know little about) is a comedy darkened by race, religion, and antisemitism (one reason perhaps it's seldom staged nowadays). Castelnuovo-Tedesco took the many moments and moods and set them to music, not necessarily following the order of the plot. Overall the piece was a good piece of dramatic music. (As I don't know the plot, it didn't matter what order the moments and moods were in. I do wonder how people familiar with the story feels about it.)
The Program Notes describes the progression of the music. I could follow it when the piece was being played. Various section leaders got some solo lines, but Frank Huang also had to work very hard at the extensive violin solos.
Frank Huang had a considering amount of solo passages in the Overture by Castelnuovo-Tedesco. Here being acknowledged by Rustioni.
For some reason I thought today's violin concerto was Brahms's. It took me a while to recalibrate to Dvorak - and then it made a lot more sense. Folksy tunes instead of long melodies, for one. And technically difficult: the Program Notes discusses how Joachim reacted to Dvorak's earlier "drafts" and had many inputs into making the concerto more playable. The composition was dedicated to Joachim, but he never performed it in public. We know Joachim and Brahms had a fallout, did that happen between Joachim and Dvorak as well?
Bell handled the technical challenges adeptly. Slight intonation issues crept in every now and then, but didn't detract from the overall mastery of the piece. The violin also produced a great tone.
I have two comments on the performance. The first one is the soloist's sound was often overwhelmed by the orchestra. During those moments I could still hear the violin, rather clearly most of the time, but kept on wishing the soloist sounded stronger. An examination of the photos from yesterday's entry would show a larger orchestra for today (4 pairs of first violins upfront yesterday; 5 pairs today). The second one was that I was surprised there wasn't a lot of musicality (call it story-telling, if you want) in his performance, which was unusual for him. I ended up admiring his violin skills more than his interpretation. He had the score in front of him, and referred to it quite often; a surprise for a world-class musician at his prime.
For an encore he played an adaption of a Chopin Nocturne for violin and harp (played by Nancy Allen). Google tells me it's No. 20, in C Sharp Minor.
Tchaikovsky provided a "program" of his fourth symphony for his patron Nadezhda von Meck. I excerpt further from the excerpts provided in the Program Notes. The first movement (andante sostenuto - Moderato con anima) describes fate, attempts to overcome it, and failure to do so at the end. The second movement (Andantino in modo di canzona) is "another phase of depression" which leads to idleness. The third (Scherzo. Pizzicato ostinato: Allegro) is the feeling of slight intoxication. The Finale (Allegro con fuoco) is a picture of the "festive merriment."
Rustioni decided to take the music for a controlled wild and enjoyable ride. The orchestra responded beautifully. While the "festive merriment" did offer much hope that fate did not have to run its course, the intrusion of the fate theme near the end makes me wonder what wins at the end. I suppose that's subject to interpretation both by the music makers and listeners. Tonight it was ambiguous, which is perfectly fine.
At the conclusion of tonight's concert.
Tonight's concert was considerable longer than yesterday's, so we caught the 10:23 pm train back. There were a lot passengers, and some quite loud.